Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34148 (RAJ)

MOOL SINGH SON OF SHRI AMAN SINGH v. HANUMAN SINGH SON OF SHRI URAM SINGH

CW/18888/2024 · 2025-01-28

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3930] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18888/2024 Mool Singh Son Of Shri Aman Singh, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Village Dadiya (Rampura) Tehsil Rengus District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus Hanuman Singh Son Of Shri Uram Singh, Resident Of Shishu Ranoli Tehsil Dantaramgarh District Sikar. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhruv Atrey for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/01/2025 1. In the instant writ petition, challenge has been made by the petitioner to the order dated 18.11.2024 passed by the Additional District Judge, Srimadhopur, dismissing his restoration application to restore the revision petition against the final order dated 19.10.2013 passed in DRA Case No.2/2010 titled as Hanuman Singh Vs. Moolsingh. 2. Counsel for the petitioner, having instructions from the petitioner, states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the decretal amount in compliance of order dated 19.10.2013, however since in execution of such order, his property has been attached, therefore, he preferred instant writ petition, seeking to restore the revision petition. [2025:RJ-JP:3930] (2 of 2) [CW-18888/2024] 3. Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach before the Executing Court to offer to deposit the entire decreetal amount, as also for detachment of his property. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. 5. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/25