IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 140 Simranpreet Kaur and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. CM-8489 matter to the recording Compromise between the parties. appellants, the present application is allowed to the effect that the Joint Family Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 03.7.2025, annexed with the present application is taken on record as Annexure A RSA-898 judgment and decree dated 23.1.2025 passed by the learned RSA-898-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.898 of 2025 Date of decision :-23.09.2025 Simranpreet Kaur and another Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Dr. Rau P.S. Girwar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Mr. G.S. Khokhar, Advocate for respondent No.6. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) 8489-C-2025 Prayer in the present application is for referring the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre recording Compromise between the parties. Heard. On request of learned counsel for the applicants nts, the present application is allowed to the effect that the Joint Family Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 03.7.2025, annexed with the present application is taken on record as Annexure A 898-2025 (O & M) The appellants have filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23.1.2025 passed by the learned 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.898 of 2025 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Dr. Rau P.S. Girwar, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Mr. G.S. Khokhar, Advocate for respondent No.6. Prayer in the present application is for referring the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court for recording Compromise between the parties. On request of learned counsel for the applicants- nts, the present application is allowed to the effect that the Joint Family Settlement/Compromise Deed dated 03.7.2025, annexed with the present application is taken on record as Annexure A-1. The appellants have filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23.1.2025 passed by the learned VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.25 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Additional District Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2016 passed by the Malout vide which suit of the plaintiff was dismissed in toto. the appellants/defendants No.7 and 8 that the present dispute was between family members. It is submitted that the plaintiff/respondent No.6 herein had filed a civil suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff was owner in possession of the suit property as described in the plaint; and for mandatory injunction directing the defendants No.1 to 6/official gratuity, family pension etc. of Surinderpal Singh to the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining the defendants No.1 to 6 not to pay gratuity etc. to defendants No.7 and 8. It is submitted that the learned trial Cour dismissed the suit of the plaintiff, however, the civil appeal filed by the plaintiffs was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide judgment and decree dated 23.1.2025. matter now stands settled by way of Compromise dated 03.7.2025 (Annexure A that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the Compromise dated 03.7.2 made by learned counsel for the parties, the present appeal is hereby RSA-898-2025 (O & M) Additional District Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2016 passed by the vide which suit of the plaintiff was dismissed in toto. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants/defendants No.7 and 8 that the present dispute was between family members. It is submitted that the plaintiff/respondent No.6 herein had filed a civil suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff was owner in possession of the suit property as described in the plaint; and for mandatory injunction directing the defendants No.1 official respondents No.1 to 5 here gratuity, family pension etc. of Surinderpal Singh to the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining the defendants No.1 to 6 not to pay gratuity etc. to defendants No.7 and 8. It is submitted that the learned trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 16.12.2016 had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff, however, the civil appeal filed by the plaintiffs was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide judgment and decree dated 23.1.2025. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter now stands settled by way of Compromise dated 03.7.2025 (Annexure A-1). Accordingly, learned counsel for the parties pray that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the Compromise dated 03.7.2025 (Annexure A-1). Heard. In view of the facts noted above and the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present appeal is hereby 2 Additional District Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), vide which suit of the plaintiff was dismissed in toto. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants/defendants No.7 and 8 that the present dispute was between family members. It is submitted that the plaintiff/respondent No.6 herein had filed a civil suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff was owner in possession of the suit property as described in the plaint; and for mandatory injunction directing the defendants No.1 respondents No.1 to 5 herein to make the payment of gratuity, family pension etc. of Surinderpal Singh to the plaintiff; and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants No.1 to 6 not to pay gratuity etc. to defendants No.7 and 8. It is submitted that the t vide judgment and decree dated 16.12.2016 had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff, however, the civil appeal filed by the plaintiffs was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib vide judgment and decree dated 23.1.2025. ed counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter now stands settled by way of Compromise dated 03.7.2025 1). Accordingly, learned counsel for the parties pray that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the Compromise In view of the facts noted above and the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present appeal is hereby VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.25 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document disposed of A-1). September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-898-2025 (O & M) disposed of in terms of the Compromise dated 03.7.2025 (Annexure Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. September 23, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 3 in terms of the Compromise dated 03.7.2025 (Annexure y, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.25 09.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document