Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3414 (UTT)

SANJEEV KUMAR SAH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/166/2025 · 2025-06-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.166 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned DAG along with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Vide order dated 05.03.2025, this Court directed the learned State Counsel to file the counter affidavit or bring on record the progress report of the investigation. 4. Today, on instructions, learned State Counsel submits that after investigation, final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner-Sanjeev Kumar Sah and he has been exonerated. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ peititon. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.06.2025 AK