SRI JUNU TANTI v. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1228/2025 · 2026-06-07
Yarenjungla Longkumer
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3414 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3414 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010076462025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1228/2025 SRI JUNU TANTI S/O LATE RUBEN TANTI @ RUBAN TANTI, R/O SEPON TEA ESTATE, P.O.
SEPON, P.S. MORANHAT, DIST. CHARAIDEO, ASSAM (BROTHER OF THE DECEASED) VERSUS THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM (INSURER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO AS 06 AC 0754 (709) TARA) 2:SUNIT GOHAIN S/O LATE PHANIDHAR GOHAIN R/O NALANI SAMUAH VILL. P.O. NAUKHAT DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM (OWNER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. AS 06 AC 0754 (709) TATA) 3:ANANTA SONOWAL S/O SRI D. SONOWAR R/O NO 1 BORMESHLOW CHAHRIKATA NO. 1 P.O. CHAMARIKATA P.S. MORAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM (DRIVER OF THE OFFENDING VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO AS 06 AC 0754 (709) TATA) 4:JAGAT RAM TANTI
Page No.# 2/3 S/O LATE RUEN TANTI @ RUBAN TANTI R/O SEPON TEA ESTATE P.O. SEPON P.S. MORANHAT DIST. CHARAIDEO ASSAM.
5:SMT. ANU TANTI W/O SRI RUPESH TANTI R/O DOOMUR DULLONG TEA ESTATE P.O. SEPON T.E.
P.S. MORANHAT DIST. CHARAIDEO ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R CHAKRAVORTY, R BASUMATARY,S RABHA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI (R-1), MR S DEKA (R2, R3),MR G SARMA (R2, R3),MS. M SAIKIA,MS. P BORTHAKUR(R-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
ORDER 08.06.2026
Heard Mr. R. Chakravorty, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A. Biyani, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. G. Sarma, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The present application has been filed by the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 32 days in filing the connected MAC Appeal against the judgment and award dated 24.09.2024 passed by the MACT, Dibrugarh in MAC Case No. 18/2022.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the main cause
Page No.# 3/3 for the delay is set out in paragraph 4 of the application. The Court has perused the application and satisfied that the sufficient cause has been shown for the delay of 32 days in filing the MAC Appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 32 days in filing the connected MAC Appeal is condoned and the application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to register the appeal and list the matter for admission after one week.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant