Pathan Imran khan v. The Union of India rep., by its Principal Secretary,
WP/15901/2015 · 2025-08-19
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34129 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34129 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010522382015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15901/2015 Between:
1. PATHAN IMRAN KHAN, S/O. PATHAN ABDUL RAZAK KHAN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, RIO.D.NO.18-155, SYED SAHEB STREET, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE REGIONAL PASS PORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASS PORT OFFICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in refusing to receive an application for correction of the petitioner date of birth as 23-12-1988 instead of 23-12-1980 in the Passport bearing No.G8719304 issued in the petitioner favour as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provision of the Passports Act, 1957 and settled principles of the legal possession apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to receive the application for correction of the date of birth and also correct the petitioner date of birth as 23-12-1988 instead of 23- 12-1980 basing on SSC Marks Memo
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 20695 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to receive the application for correction the petitioner date of birth as 23-12-1988 instead of 2312-1980 and take appropriate action on the same, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following ORDER:
During the course of hearing, learned for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the respondent authorities have rectified the corrections of the date of birth in the passport of the petitioner. Recording the above submission, no further orders are required in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Dated: 20.08.2025 KAS