Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34127 (RAJ)

SONU DEVI W/O SHRI RAJ KUMAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18667/2024 · 2025-01-07

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:779-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18667/2024 1. Sonu Devi W/o Shri Raj Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gram Jamwaramgarh, Post Jamwaramgarh, Harijano Ka Mohalla The Jamwaramgarh, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 303109 2. Raj Kumar S/o Shri Sitaram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Harijan Mohalla, Jamwaramgarh, Teh Jamwaramgarh Jaipur, Rajasthan - 303109 3. Vikas S/o Shri Suraj Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 124 Shree Ram Colony, Shanichar Ji Ka Mandir Ke Piche, Station Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302006. 4. Nisha Chanwariya W/o Shri Aman Kumar Kharara, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Shree Ram Colony, Sindhi Camp, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302006 5. Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Hanuman, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 63 Dhul Kot, Harijan Basti, Purani Basti, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302001 6. Santosh Devi W/o Shri Sandeep Kumar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 63 Dhool Kot, Yagyashala Kafawdi, Purani Basti, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302001 7. Neha Chanwaria D/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Harijan Mohalla Jahota, Tehsil Rampura Dabri, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan - 303701 8. Aman Kumar Kharara S/o Shri Suraj Kumar Kharara, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 124 Shree Ram Colony, Station Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302006 ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur. 2. Director, Local Self Government Department, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chitransh Mathur on behalf of Mr. Devkrishna Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. GS Gill, AAG assisted by Ms. Shikha Sharma [2025:RJ-JP:779-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-18667/2024] HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 07/01/2025 In view of subsequent events that the process of recruitment has been halted, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to revive, in case the respondents proceed to make recruitment under the impugned rules. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ KAMLESH KUMAR-RAHUL/18