Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:33938
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2250 of 2025 1 - Smt Anjali Yadav W/o Rahul Yadav Aged About 28 Years R/o Block 4/c Road 11, Sector 06, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg C.G.
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 - Rahul Yadav Police Constable No. 108 B N, C A F Bhilai Durg, C.G. Aged About 31 Years S/o Shri Hiralal Yadav R/o Block No. 100/a, Camp-1, Subhash Chowk, Bhilai District Durg C.G. 4 - Deputy Commandant, 7th Batallion C A F Bhilai, District Durg C.G.
... Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Rahil Arun Kochar, Adv. For State : Ms. Binu Sharma, P.L. Hon'ble
Shri
Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order
on Board
18/07/2025 Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.07.18 18:17:05 +0530
2 1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023 against inaction of the respondent No.2/DGP, Raipur who is not considering the representation dated 24.07.2024 (Annexure A-1) of the petitioner whereby she had intimated that respondent No. 3 who is petitioner’s husband has contracted second marriage on 11.03.2024 with Smt. Rupa Yadav despite of being aware that petitioner has also filed FA(MAT) No. 33/2024 which has been filed against the order of divorce dated 21.12.2023 passed by learned Family Court and has violated the order passed by Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 25.01.2024 whereby the Court had directed that parties shall govern by the statutory provisions of Section 15 of Hindu Marriage Act. 2 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition before the appropriate Bench. 3 Learned State counsel has no objection to this proposition put forth by the counsel for the applicant. 4 Prayer is allowed. 5 Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu