Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34127 (AP)

Kalluri Ramakrishna Reddy, v. The A.P.C.P.D.C.L.,

WP/277/2014 · 2025-07-29

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010524932014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 277/2014 Between: 1. KALLURI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY,, S/O.LATE K.THIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. TARIGONDA VILLAGE, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. T.NIRMALAMMA,, W/O. LATE T.NARASIRNHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. REGADAPALLE, SETTIPALLE VILLAGE, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE A P C P D C L, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, PILER DIVISION, APSPDCL, PILER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISION, APSPDCL, KALIKIRI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. S SATTAR SAHEB, S/O. HUSSAIN SAHEB, BURUJU KOTHAPALLE, H/O. SETTIPALLE VILLAGE, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR 2 DISTRICT. 8. T KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. T.MADDI REDDY, THUGUVARIPALLE, H/O. SETTIPALLE VILLAGE, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. GP FOR ENERGY 3. P VINOD KUMAR The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri S.V. Muni Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to the Writ Petitioners to approach the Competent Forum to establish their right and title. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioners to approach the Competent Forum to establish their right and title over the subject land. No order as to costs. 4. If the Writ Petitioners approach the Competent Forum within eight (08) weeks from today, the Court shall entertain the same without reference to the law of limitation. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 30.07.2025 Vns