[2025:RJ-JP:25327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1009/2025 Meeta Mathur W/o Mr. Brijendra Singh D/o Shri S.k. Mathur, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 261, Shri Gopal Nagar, Gopalpura By- Pass 80 Feet Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, University Of Rajasthan, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. University Of Rajasthan, Through Registrar, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Shah, Sr. Adv. asst. by Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal & Ms. Taruna For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarthak Rastogi, Mr. Tushar Kumar & Mr. Aditya Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/07/2025 1. The writ petition has been listed in the Orders category, however, with consent of learned counsel for both parties, same has been heard finally on merits. 2. Instant writ petition has been filed by and on behalf of petitioner, impugning three orders dated 30.11.2024, 12.12.2024 and 01.01.2025, whereby and whereunder petitioner was asked to appear in the inquiry before the Inquiry Officer- Professor Sh. J.P. Sharma, Former Vice Chancellor of Mohan Lal Sukhadia University, Udaipur and to submit documents, which are required during inquiry proceedings. [2025:RJ-JP:25327] (2 of 3) [CW-1009/2025] 3. Learned counsel for respondents, at the outset, submits that during course of writ petition, the inquiry proceedings by the Inquiry Officer, have been concluded and petitioner was given opportunity of hearing and in pursuance thereof, she appeared and participated in the inquiry. In support of such contention, learned counsel has placed on record a letter dated 21.06.2025, written by the Inquiry Officer- Professor Sh. J.P. Sharma to the Vice Chancellor, University of Rajasthan, seeking permission to produce inquiry report before the Vice Chancellor, University of Rajasthan. 4. Learned Senior Counsel, appearing for petitioner, does not dispute that the petitioner appeared before the Inquiry Officer and participated in the inquiry. 5. In view of above, challenge to above-referred three orders in instant writ petition, has rendered infructuous, however, as far as grievance of petitioner, in respect of having no basis for initiation of inquiry and other objections, are concerned, keeping all these objections alive, this Court deems it just and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition. 6. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioner is agreeable for the aforesaid liberty and seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 7. In view of above, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn and same stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 8. Needless to observe that as and when the inquiry report is submitted by the Inquiry Officer before the Vice Chancellor, University of Rajasthan, a copy of same, alongwith all enclosures, [2025:RJ-JP:25327] (3 of 3) [CW-1009/2025] shall also be served to petitioner, so that she may be able to go through the inquiry report and take appropriate action in furtherance thereof. 9. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/56