IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14131 of 2025 Date of Decision: 24.11.2025 __________________________________________________________ Sh. Govind Ram …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General, for State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): While placing on record communication dated 03.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of order dated 18.10.2025, issued by afore authority, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that relief, as prayed for, already stands granted to the petitioner. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents vis-a-vis relief prayed for in the instant petition, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General. Petitioner has been granted pensionary benefits vide order dated 18.10.2025 . 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly the same is disposed of, with the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 direction to respondents that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid order, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four weeks. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 24, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)