1 2025:CGHC:25320 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 607 of 2021 1 - Gopal Sardar S/o Late Bhaven Sardar Aged About 58 Years Cast- Kshtriya Occupation- Agriculture, R/o Village- Subhasnagar, P.S.- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Vasudev Vishwas S/o Late Nilkamal Vishwas Aged About 63 Years Cast- Namosudra Occupation- Retired Serviceman, R/o Village- Subhasnagar, P.S.- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Subhas Sardar S/o Late Bhaven Sardar Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Subhasnagar, P.S.- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Nepal Sardar S/o Late Bhaven Sardar Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Subhasnagar, P.S.- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar-Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Halka Patwari No. 17, Village Subhasnagar Of Tahsildar Ambikapur, Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Revenue Inspector, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, Through State Of Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- For Petitioner : Shri A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 18.06.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that during the pendency of this petition, the revenue authorities demarcated the suit property and submitted their report. He would further submit that the said demarcation report has been placed before the learned trial Court. He would contend that a direction may be issued to the learned trial Court to consider the report submitted by the revenue authorities while adjudicating the civil suit. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that during the pendency of this petition, the revenue authorities conducted demarcation and submitted their report, which has already been placed on record before the learned trial Court, therefore the learned trial Court is directed to consider the demarcation report while adjudicating the civil suit. 4. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. 3 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case including the demarcation report. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi