Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34111 (JHR)

REKHA SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2076/2019 · 2025-09-22

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:29387 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2076 of 2019 Rekha Sinha, aged about 52 years, D/o- Shree Prakash Sinha, resident of Professor's Colony, New Barganda, P.O. and P.S. Giridih, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The State of Jharkhand through its Principal Secretary, Higher, Technical and Skill Development Department, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. Vinoba Bhave University through Vice-Chancellor, Hazaribag, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag. 4. The Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag. 5. The Principal, Shree R.K. Mahila College, Giridih, P.O. and P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. J. F. Toppo, GA-V Mr. Neil Abhijiet Toppo, AC to GA-V For the Respondent-University : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Advocate -------- Order No.9 /Dated: 22nd September 2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: “1.That in this writ application, the petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ / writs, order / orders, direction / directions particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing and commanding upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in service of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Professor, as she is working against the sanctioned and vacant post under the respondents, since 07.09.2001 and further to allow the petitioner to continue on the post in question till regularization as the petitioner fulfills all the criteria including requisite qualification. AND Pass such other order or orders as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2025:JHHC:29387 2 petitioner is entitled to be regularized in service as she is working since 2001 against a sanctioned and vacant post. It is submitted that several representations were filed by the petitioner before the concerned respondents but to no effect. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner may approach the concerned respondents by filing a fresh representation for redressal of her grievance. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.4 along with all relevant documents with regard to the claim made in this writ application. After receiving the detailed representation of the Petitioner, the Respondent no.4 will scrutinize the same and forward the claim of the Petitioner to the Respondent-State within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation and the Respondent-State, who in turn, shall pass a final order on the claim of the Petitioner within a further period of 12 weeks. Thereafter, if the claim of the petitioner is found to be genuine, a formal order shall be passed within another two weeks. 5. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 22.09.2025 Amit