Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34110 (AP)

K SIDDAMMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/31972/2022 · 2025-08-17

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010522772022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 31972/2022 Between: 1. K SIDDAMMA, W/O. K.VENKATA REDDY, AGE. 45 YEARS, R/O. DAMARA KUPPAM, KOMARAGUTA DAMARA KUPPAM, VEDURUKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR TALUKA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VEDURUKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DHEERA KANISHKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 The Court made the following Order: In spite of giving opportunity for the petitioner to make an alternative arrangement as per the orders of this Court dated 04.08.2025, he is neither present in person nor through his counsel. 2. The counsel on record, Mr. Dheera Kanishka, already gave up vakalath by giving no objection. Accordingly, the said counsel’s submissions were already recorded in the orders of this Court dated 04.08.2025. Since there is no representation for the petitioner, as per the orders of this Court dated 04.08.2025, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.08.2025 PNS