Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34109 (AP)

M/S. NIAGARA PESTICIDES & CHEMICALS PVT.LTD, GUNTUR v. DY.COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, HYDERABAD AND 2 OTHERS

WP/14239/2005 · 2025-08-06

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

VT I APHC010520772005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14239 OF 2005 Between: M/S. Niagara Pesticides & Chemicals PVT.LTD, GUNTUR, Rep.by its Managing Director,P.S.N.Prasad,S/o.Late Pulla Rao O/o.Flat.No.10 6, Aziz Towers, Hyderguda R/o. Guntur. ...Petitioner AND 1. DY Commissioner Of Labour Hyderabad, Appellate Authority, Payment of Gratuity Hyderabad. Asst Commissioner of Labourlll, Hyderabad. Sri K Durgambica Vara Prasad, S/o. S.Prabhakar Reddy R/o. H.No.773 (2-3-64/F), Thirumalanagar Opp: Police Lines Amberpet 2. 3. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the case in P.G.No.159/2001 dated 29th January, 2004 of the second respondent as confirmed by the first respondent in case No.PGA/7/2004, dated 8th day of April 2005 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently quash the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2005(WVMP 2543 OF 2005 Between: Sri K Durgambica Vara Prasad, S/o Late K.V.Krishna Rao, aged about 40 years, Occ; Pvt.Service, R/o Meerpet, R.R.District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.3 AND 1. M/S. Niagara Pesticides & Chemicals PVT.LTD, GUNTUR, Rep.by Director, P.S.N. Prasad,S/o. Late O/o.Flat.No.106, Aziz Towers, Hyderguda R/o. Guntur. Pulla Rao its Managing ...Respondent/Petitioner 1. DY Commissioner Of Labour Hyderabad, Appellate Authority, Payment of Gratuity Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Respondent No.1 2. Asst Commissioner of Labourlll, Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Respondent No.2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WPMP NO. 18085/2005 in WP No. 14239/2005 dt. 4-7-2005 lA NO: 2 OF 2QQ5(WPMP 18085 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents 1 & 2 not to disburse the amounts of Rs.40,387/- to the 3rd respondent lying with the 1st respondent. ^' f Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI K LAKSHMAN The Court made the following order: APHC010520772005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14239/2005 Between: 1.M/S. NIAGARA PESTICIDES & CHEMICALS PVT.LTD, GUNTUR, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,P.S.N.PRASAD,S/0.LATE PULLA RAO O/O.FLAT.NO.106, AZIZ TOWERS, HYDERGUDA R/0. GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1.DY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR HYDERABAD AND 2 OTHERS, APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PAYMENT OF GRATUITY HYDERABAD. 2.ASST COMMISSIONER OF LABOURIII, HYDERABAD. 3.SRI K DURGAMBICA VARA PRASAD, S/0. S.PRABHAKAR REDDY R/0. H.N0.773 (2-3-64/F), THIRUMALANAGAR OPP: POLICE LINES AMBERPET ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the case in P.G.No. 159/2001 dated 29th January, 2004 of the second respondent as confirmed by the first respondent in case No.PGA/7/2004, dated 8th day of April 2005 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently quash the same and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in ' the circumstances of the case. lA NO: 1 OF 2005(WVMP 2543 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to JB vacate the interim orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WPMP NO. 18085/2005 in WP No. 14239/2005 dt. 4-7-2005 % lA NO: 2 OF 2005(WPMP 18085 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents 1 & 2 not to disburse the amounts of Rs.40,387/- to the 3rd respondent lying with the 1st respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR LABOUR 2.K LAKSHMAN The Court made the following order: Sri P.Ravi Kanth, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him and could not get instructions from him. The matter is of the year 2005. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. In view of the above, this Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. If at all the petitioner feels that cause in this writ petition survives, he can move an appropriate application within a period of two(02) months from the month of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT^EGiS TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Venkat Challa, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Labour ,High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri. K Lakshman, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies. AL ■' 1 •- aw 'm :' HIGH COURT TL DATED:07/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 14239 OF 2005 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS