BABULAL JAIN S/O LATE SHRI ROOPCHAND JAIN v. MEHAR SINGH S/O SHRI DHUNARAM
CW/18886/2024 · 2025-05-05
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34102 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34102 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18861] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18886/2024 Babulal Jain S/o Late Shri Roopchand Jain, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of 97, Patel Nagar, Deoli, District- Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Mehar Singh S/o Shri Dhunaram, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Village Post-Bhankri, Tehsil- Kotputli, Sub- Tehsil Pavta, District- Jaipur. At Present Resident Of Plot No. S-2, Plot No. 570, Antariksh Apartment,surya Nagar, Near Riddhi Siddhi, Behind Gangotri Filing Station, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-
302018. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Sakshi Tiwari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/05/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing direction to the Rent Tribunal to decide the eviction application submitted by the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame.
2. Perusal of the record indicates that an application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2001”) was submitted by the petitioner before the Rent Tribunal No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan-Ist, Jaipur in the year 2023.
3. Lot of applications in this regard are pending before the Tribunal, hence, no priority can be given to the petitioner to decide his application out of turn. However, looking to the age of the
[2025:RJ-JP:18861] (2 of 2) [CW-18886/2024] petitioner, i.e., 74 years, the Tribunal is expected to make all the possible endeavours to decide the pending application expeditiously as early as possible.
4. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /359