IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 534 Dilbag Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner on the post of Clerk/Forest Guard keeping in view the victim of terrorist v surviving due to efflux of time. 2. preliminary submissions of written statement filed by way of affidavit of the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, dated 15.12.2003, the report dated 02.12.20 submitted to the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, the deceased the petitioner was not the bread not be considered under the appointment. Further that, the incident took place in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Dilbag Singh Versus f Punjab and Others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner on the post of Clerk/Forest Guard keeping in view his qualification the victim of terrorist violence in the State of Punjab, might surviving due to efflux of time. Moreover, learned State counsel refers to paras 1 and 2 of preliminary submissions of written statement filed by way of affidavit of the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, dated 15.12.2003, the report dated 02.12.2003 by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amritsar to the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, the deceased the petitioner was not the bread-winner of the family, therefore, he could not be considered under the Instructions dated 05.02.1996 appointment. Further that, the incident took place in IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4983-2003 (O & M) Date of decision: 25.03.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner on the post of his qualifications, being dependent of iolence in the State of Punjab, might not even be ned State counsel refers to paras 1 and 2 of preliminary submissions of written statement filed by way of affidavit of the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, dated 15.12.2003, to state that as per 3 by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amritsar-I, to the Deputy Commissioner, Amritsar, the deceased-mother of winner of the family, therefore, he could ctions dated 05.02.1996 for appointment. Further that, the incident took place in 1987, when he was a PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.26 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-4983-2003 -2- minor and attained the age of majority in the year 1993 and no application dated 11.06.1993 was ever received by the respondents, as stated in para 5 of the reply on merits, which was not controverted by filing any replication. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. 25.03.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.26 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.