NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7586 of 2025 Vedprakash Thakur S/o Suman Lal Thakur Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher L.B. At Government Primary Scholl Kottara, Block - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Collector Complex, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer, Deo Office, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Education Officer Block -Charama District- North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Divisional Magistrate (Revenue), President Of Block Level Committee Block Charama District - North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Shiv Sewak, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms Anuja Sharma, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 11.07.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs: “a. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing the transfer order dated 05.06.2025 being arbitrary, irrational and malafide (annexure P2). b. Grant interim relief by staying the operation of the transfer/displacement of the Petitioner pending final disposal of this writ petition. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.11 17:09:11 +0530 Wps 7586 of 2025 2 c. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the impugned transfer order dated 05.06.2025, he has moved representation before respondent-2 on 30.06.2025 but till date, the representation has not been decided. 3. At this stage, learned State counsel would submit on instructions that the authority concerned has decided the representation of the petitioner today itself, and now, petitioner, if he so desires, may approach the Committee constituted by the State Government vide notification dated 07.07.2025, and the Divisional Commissioner of the said Committee is the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner, if so submitted against the order of authority concerned. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned State counsel that the representation of the petitioner has already been decided today itself, it is directed to respondent-2 that he shall immediately communicate the same to the petitioner within three days from today, and then the petitioner may move another representation before the Committee constituted by the State Government vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of his grievances, if any, the said Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner in objective manner in accordance with law, as early as possible. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma