Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34096 (JHR)

REETU TOPPO v. BIRSA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY

WPC/4126/2019 · 2025-09-23

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:29560 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4126 of 2019 -- Reetu Toppo, Aged about 36 years, wife of Nishant Oraon, Resident of 1/B-16, Down Tagore Hill, P.O. Morabadi, P.S. Lalpur, District-Ranchi .......Petitioner. -Versus- 1. Birsa Agriculture University, Kanke, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi. 2. Vice Chancellor, Birsa Agriculture University, Kanke, P.O. &P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi 3. Registrar, Birsa Agriculture University, Kanke, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi 4. University Grant Commission represented through its Chairman having office at Bahadur Shah Zaffar Marg, New Delhi, P.O. & P.S. New Delhi, District-New Delhi 5. Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, office at Circular Road, Deputy Para, P.O. & P.S.-Lalpur, Distt. Ranchi ...Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Asim Kumar Sahni, Advocate For the Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Prasenjit Mahato, Advocate -- 05/23.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: For a direction upon the respondents particularly the Respondent No.1 to 3 for issuance of Certificate of Ph.D. degree to the petitioner as per the University Grant Commission (Minimum Standard and Procedure for Award of M.Phil/Ph.D. degree) Regulation 2009; 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that interest of justice would be sufficed by granting liberty to the Petitioner to file fresh representation in view of the fact that earlier the representation (Annexure-7) which was made by the Petitioner has not yet been disposed of. 4. Having regard to the limited submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner; no objection has been raised by the Respondents; however, learned counsel 2025:JHHC:29560 2 fairly submits that the petitioner may be directed to file fresh representation before the respondent no. 2. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2. along with all necessary documents in support of his claim within a period of 4 weeks. The moment 2nd Respondent will receive the representation, he will look into the matter and take a decision in accordance with law and applicable Rules. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of in the manner indicated hereinabove. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 23rd September, 2025 jk