IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 Ramesh Kumar SDO (Operation) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for setting aside the 20.01.2025 (Annexure P No. 1482 of 2022 and judgment dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure P by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 20.01.2025 was dismissed. to interfere in the matter, learned may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition 24.03.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-175 Date of Decision: Ramesh Kumar Versus SDO (Operation) and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. BS Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned trial Court in No. 1482 of 2022 and judgment dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure P by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 20.01.2025 was After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. .03.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1752-2025 Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA . BS Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated 1) passed by the learned trial Court in Civil Suit No. 1482 of 2022 and judgment dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 20.01.2025 was me, when this Court is not inclined counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the order dated Civil Suit 3) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 20.01.2025 was me, when this Court is not inclined counsel for the petitioner submits that he RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.25 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.