Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34094 (ALL)

SMT. DEEPA KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/3182/2022 · 2025-09-17

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3182 of 2022 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. Order on withdrawal application 1. Sri Virendra Kumar, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Vijay Kumar, learned AGA for the State are present but none is present on behalf of O.P. No.2 even in revised call. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that revisionist is wife of O.P. No.2 and she filed the instant revision against the order dated 23.05.2022 passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for enhancement of the maintenance allowance but now dispute between husband and wife has been resolved, therefore, revisionist does want to contest the matter any further and she filed the instant withdrawal application, therefore, by allowing the withdrawal application, instant revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Learned AGA is having no objection. 4. Considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant/revisionist, instant withdrawal application is hereby allowed and instant revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. September 18, 2025 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh, Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Alok Kumar, Amit Daga, G.A., Shivam Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) Smt. Deepa Kumari .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad