Pusapati Surendra Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/24646/2018 · 2025-03-26
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34090 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34090 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010522252018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No.. 24646/2018 Between: Pusapati Surendra Babu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VELAGANI NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
2. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA)
3. VAKA KRANTHI SRI
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents particularly the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in not selecting the petitioner for the Post of Cluster Resource Person at Cheenepalli ZPHS School KV Palli Mandal, Chittoor on contract basis pursuance to the notification dated 2.7.2017 issued by the 3rd respondent even the petitioner is having proper qualification and in selecting the 5th respondent to the said post even without required qualification is arbitrary illegal and against to the provisions of Article 16 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Judgment in O.A.2518/2013 dt.3.4.2014 and batch consequently, direct the official respondents to appoint the petitioner to the said post.”
2
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I and learned Standing Counsel for Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) are in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 24246 of 2018
26.03.2025
Mjl /*