PAYALBEN BHARATKUMAR KODIYATAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT
SCA/6870/2025 · 2025-05-08
Nirzar S Desai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3409 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3409 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C/SCA/6870/2025 ORDER DATED: 08/05/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6870 of 2025 ===================================================== PAYALBEN BHARATKUMAR KODIYATAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ===================================================== Appearance: NIYATI V VAISHNAV(6168) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR ADITYA DAVDA ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 =====================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 08/05/2025
ORAL ORDER 1.Heard learned advocate Ms. Niyati V. Vaishnav appearing for the petitioner. 2.By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-
“(A) direct respondent authorities to reconsider the case of the petitioner for the appointment on the post of conductor by quashing and setting aside the office
order dated 03.04.2025 rejecting the candidature of the petitioner; Annex ‘C’ (B) direct the respondent authorities to consider the application/representation made by the petitioner dated 11.04.2025 by showing liberal approach; Annex ‘E’ (C)Award the cost of the petition, and
C/SCA/6870/2025 ORDER DATED: 08/05/2025 (D) grant any other relief or pass any other order which the Honourable Court may consider as just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3.At the outset, learned advocate Ms. Niyati Vaishnav, under instructions states that the petitioner does not want to press prayer 6(A) in this petition as the petitioner’s representation dated 11.4.2025 is already pending with the respondent authorities and the respondents may be directed to decide the same in accordance with law. 4.In view of that as the petitioner has not pressed for prayer made in paragraph No.6(A), the respondent authority and more particularly, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation dated 11.4.2025 preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law as early as possible and communicate the order to the petitioner by way of R.P.AD. 5.With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present petition stands disposed of.
(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Pallavi Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PALLAVIBEN PRABHUDAS PANCHAL(HC01403), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/05/2025 16:48:51