HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7769 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. This matter has been taken up on mentioning. 3. Heard Mr. Chandra Bhan Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Neeraj, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State respondents. 4. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Case Crime No. 0257 of 2018 and Case No. 11987 of 2020, under Sections 420, 406, 323, 506 IPC, P.S. Ughati, District Badaun and the chargesheet no. 15A/2019 dated 25.12.2019 and cognizance order dated 22.10.2020 and summoning order dated 23.12.2020, 22.2.2021, 7.4.2021, 5.8.2021, 28.9.2021, 30.11.2021, 29.1.2022, 4.4.2022, 21.5.2022 and 9.7.2022 and non-bailable warrants dated 22.8.2022, 29.9.2022, 16.11.2022, 21.12.2022, 25.1.2023, 24.2.2023, 27.3.2023, 29.4.2023, 31.5.2023, 12.7.2023, 19.8.2023, 19.10.2023, 7.11.2023 on the basis of compromise dated 18.12.2023. 5. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has already been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhan Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Neeraj Rajiv Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 7. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case Crime No. 0257 of 2018 and Case No. 11987 of 2020, under Sections 420, 406, 323, 506 IPC, P.S. Ughati, District Badaun and the chargesheet no. 15A/2019 dated 25.12.2019 and cognizance order dated 22.10.2020 and summoning order dated 23.12.2020, 22.2.2021, 7.4.2021, 5.8.2021, 28.9.2021, 30.11.2021, 29.1.2022, 4.4.2022, 21.5.2022 and 9.7.2022 and non-bailable warrants dated 22.8.2022, 29.9.2022, 16.11.2022, 21.12.2022, 25.1.2023, 24.2.2023, 27.3.2023, 29.4.2023, 31.5.2023, 12.7.2023, 19.8.2023, 19.10.2023, 7.11.2023 on the basis of compromise dated 18.12.2023 are hereby quashed. 9. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 24, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 7769 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad