Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34085 (CHH)

BHAGIRATHI DEWANGAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7542/2025 · 2025-08-03

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:38513 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7542 of 2025 1 - Bhagirathi Dewangan S/o Late Shri Beniram Dewangan Aged About 66 Years R/o Village And Post Singhara Tahsil And P.S. Malkharoda Distt- Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya Police Station And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Divisional Joint Director O/o Divisional Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension Bilaspur Division Near Nehru Chowk District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer (Deo) Office Of District Education Officer Sakti District- Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Block Education Officer (Beo) O/o Block Education Officer Malkharaoda District- Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate along with Ms. Priya Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy A.G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 04/08/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming for the following reliefs: VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.05 20:09:45 +0530 2 “(i) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records concerning the case of the petitioner from the possession of the respondent authorities for its kind perusal. (ii) That the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to prefer representation before Respondent No. 2, Divisional Joint Director, Bilaspur and also before Respondent No. 3 DEO, Sakti and also direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner for release of 3rd Time Scale Pay with arrears to the petitioner after completion of 30 years of services of the petitioner. (iii) That this Hon'ble Court may also kindly be pleased to grant suitable compensation to the petitioner from the respondent-authorities for the mental and physical hardships suffered by him without there being any fault on his part and also grant cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition at this juncture may be disposed of directing the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, so far as grant of 3rd time bound pay-scale/kramonnati on completion of 30 years of service in terms of the circulars of the State Government dated 08.08.2018 and 25.01.2021. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that they have no objection, if such a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner is being made to the authorities concerned. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to move his fresh representation before the respondents No. 3 and 4 within 03 weeks from today and then the respondents No. 3 3 and 4 shall ensure that the claim/representation of the petitioner is decided at the earliest, in accordance with the rules governing the field, preferably within 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved