YADAVRAO SHANKARRAO SOMWANSHI DIED v. SAMBHAJIRAO SHIVAJIRAO SOMWANSHI
CA/13955/2024 · 2026-08-19
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3408 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3408 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ca8900.25- -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 960 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8900 OF 2025 IN SAST/21178/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13956 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8901 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8902 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13953 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13954 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13955 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13958 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13957 OF 2024 Yadavrao Shankarrao Somwanshi Died VERSUS Sambhajirao Shivajirao Somwanshi ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Narsinh L. Jadhav, AGP for Respondents: Mr. P. M. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4a To 4c : Ms. Nikita D. Ragade h/f Mr. D.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent Nos. 14a To 14d4 : Mr. Sanket S. Kulkarni …..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 19th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The civil application No.8900 of 2025 is filed for condonation of delay of 209 days caused in filing the application for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent No.4 on record. 2. The civil application No.13958 of 2024 is filed for condonation of delay of 148 days caused in filing the application for 2026:BHC-AUG:37635
ca8900.25- -2- bringing the legal representatives of respondent No. 14D on record. 3. The civil application No.8902 of 2025 is filed seeking permission to add the respondents as mentioned in the para 2 and 4 of the said application as party respondents in the second appeal. Considering the fact that the proposed respondents have purchased the property during pendency of the proceeding, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. 4. The civil application No. 13954 of 2024 is filed for condonation of delay of 2577 days caused in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives of appellant No. 1E on record. 5. The civil application No. 13955 of 2024 is filed for condonation of delay of 4430 days caused in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives of respondent No. 14 on record. 6. The civil application No.13956 of 2024 is filed for condonation of delay of 1352 days caused in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives of respondent No. 6 on record. 7. The civil application No.13957 of 2024 is filed for condonation of delay of 585 days caused in filing the application for
ca8900.25- -3- bringing the legal representatives of appellant No. 2 on record. 8. Perused the applications. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties. Learned advocates for the respective respondents strongly opposed the applications. 9. For the reasons stated in the applications, all the aforesaid Civil Applications deserve to be allowed in the interst of justice to decide the lis between the parties on merits as the delay is not deliberately caused. All the applications are allowed. 10. In the respective applications, the amendments shall be carried out within two weeks, failing which the applicants in the said application(s) shall deposit an amount of Rs.2,000/- with the Advocates Chambers Allottees Maintenance Co-operative Society, High Court Premises, Aurangabad, in respect of the application(s) in which the applicants fail to take the necessary steps as directed above.
Abatement, if any, is set aside. 11. In civil application No. 13953 of 2024, reissue notice to the respondent No. 1E and 17. Learned advocate for the appellants is
directed to take necessary steps in respect of respondent Nos. 15-B and 15-D, who are reported to be dead.
ca8900.25- -4-
12. Learned advocate for the appellants filed a pursis thereby furnishing fresh addresses of respondent Nos. 8, 9, 10, 13, 19 and 20, which is taken on record and marked “X-1”. Issue notice to the said respondents on the said addresses, returnable on 16.09.2026.
13. In addition to the regular mode of service, the applicants/ appellants are permitted to serve the unserved respondents by private notice, as is permissible in law.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/