ROSHANLAL SAINI S/O SHRI DHARAM SINGH v. G.K. GOSWAMI THE THEN INQUIRY OFFICER
CCP/57/2024 · 2025-09-09
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3407 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3407 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36345] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 57/2024 Roshan Lal Saini S/o Shri Dharam Singh, Aged About 63 Years, R/o 6/379, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. G.k. Goswami The Then Inquiry Officer, B-122, Malviya Nagar Jaipur.
2. Shri Kumar Pal Gautam The Housing Commissoner, Rajasthan Housing Board Near Vihan Sabha Jaipur.
3. Smt. Alpha Chaudhary, The Secretary, Rajasthan Housing Board Near Vidhan Sabha, Janpath Jaipur.
4. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Udh Department Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents-Contemnors For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tara Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla Mr. Raghav Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 09/09/2025
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the interim order dated 15.09.2015.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide
order dated 15.09.2015, the Court restrained the respondents from making any recovery from the petitioner till disposal of the writ petition. Learned counsel also submits that after the interim
order, the respondents have filed the suit for recovery from the petitioner before the Court concerned.
[2025:RJ-JP:36345] (2 of 2) [CCP-57/2024]
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents- contemnors submits that they have filed an affidavit today with the averments that the Rajasthan Housing Board shall not pursue the recovery suit until disposal of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19668/2013.
4. In view of the statement on oath by the respondents that they will not pursue any recovery suit, no further cause of action survives to pursue this contempt petition.
5. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of.
6. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh contempt petition if any cause of action arises from any act of the respondents.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /117