[2025:RJ-JP:36735] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1253/2023 Chandra Prakash S/o Shri Laxman Ram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o B-148, Chhatra Chhaya Apartment, Flat No. 403, Mangal Marg, Bapu Nagar Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Anand Kumar, Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Umesh Mishra, Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma with Mr. Pushpendra Singh Rana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Almas Khanam & Ms. Kavita Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 10/09/2025 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 21.07.2023 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur in Appeal No.5871/2021. By the order dated 21.07.2023, the learned Tribunal has allowed the appeal of the petitioner-appellant and directed the respondent-Department to accord promotion to the petitioner on the post of RPS (Junior Scale) against the vacancy of the year 2013-14. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents-contemnors submits that so as to [2025:RJ-JP:36735] (2 of 2) [CCP-1253/2023] make compliance of the order issued by the learned Tribunal and to accord promotion to the petitioner on the post of RPS (Junior Scale) against the vacancy of the year 2013-14, the Department of Finance vide its order dated 04.09.2025 has created a shadow post of RPS (Junior Scale) so as to give promotion to the petitioner against the vacancy of the year 2013-14. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed before this Court the letter dated 09.09.2025 alongwith review note issued by the Director General of Police so as to allow promotion to the petitioner on the post of RPS (Junior Scale) against the vacancy of the year 2013-14. The letters dated 04.09.2025 and 09.09.2025 are also taken on record. Learned Additional Advocate General assures this Court that necessary order of promotion of the petitioner would be issued within a period of four weeks. In view of the aforesaid facts, the present contempt petition is disposed of treating to be substantial compliance by the respondents. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to make an application for revival of the contempt petition if order of formal promotion and consequential benefits is directed by the learned Tribunal is not issued within a period of four weeks. Notices shall stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /120