1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6313 of 2021 1 - Malik Ram Verma S/o Late Keju Ram Verma Aged About 63 Years Retired Inspector (M), Phq-Gb, Raipur, And Resident Of Sector-3 Street No. 12, Near Sumeru Math, Professor Colony, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home (Police), Mahanadi, Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Under Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Home (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Director General Of Police Chhattisgarh Police Headquarter, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Indra Mukhtiyar Presently Working In Administration (G.B.) Phq, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Paskal Ekka Presently Working In Administration (G.B.), Phq, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate For State : Mr.Vedant Shadangi, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 05.08.2025 1. At the very outset,Mr. Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities and in turn, the authority concerned may be directed to decide it expeditiously. REKHA SINGH -2- 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State would oppose the submissions made by Mr. Dubey. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Dubey, this petition at this juncture is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a fresh representation before respondent authorities and in turn, the authority concerned is directed to decide it expeditiously in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha