APHC010520152023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5777/2023 Between: 1. BOMPADA JHANSI RANI, W/O (LATE) BOMPADA RAMA RAO AGED 50 YRS D.NO.9-29-22/1 , FLAT NO.406 KUTIR APARTMENTS, BALAJI NAGAR, TYCON RESTAURANT BACK , SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR A MALLIKARJUNA, I.A.S.(FAC) , METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONER VICE CHAIRMAN VMRDA, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SRI D D G MULLAR, THE DISTRICT AUDIT OFFICER (DAO) STATE AUDIT, NEAR ZILLA PARISHAD OFFICE VISAKHAPATNAM ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to pass an Order to Punish the Respondents 1 and 2 under the Contempts of Court Act for Disobedience of the Directions of the Honble Andhra Pradesh High Court in W.P. No.18134/2023 of Order dated 26-07-2023 and pass such othre order or orders as the Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case . and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Somisetty Ganesh Babu SC For VUDA and MUDA The Court made the following: 2 VS,J C.C.No.5777 of 2023 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.18134 of 2023 on 26.07.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….dispose of the writ petition, by directing the respondents 2 and 3 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 03.07.2023, 14.06.2023 and 31.05.2023 made by the petitioner within a period of four (04) weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of the order.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Chaitanya Polisetty, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, has stated that the order dated 26.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18134 of 2023 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to withdraw this contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.07.2025 KGR