Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:40014
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7848 of 2025 1 - Raghunandan Singh Paikra S/o Chain Singh Paikra Aged About 44 Years Posted As Lecturer (Commerce) Government Higher Secondary School Baderabeli Block Malkharoda District- Sakti (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector District- Sakti (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer District- Sakti (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Zainab Vanak, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Gov. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Order on Board 08/08/2025
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 12/06/2025 (Annexure- P/1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Higher Secondary School Baderabeli, Block Malkharoda, Dist- Sakti to Govt. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.09.16 09:40:41 +0530
2 Higher Secondary School Pailimeta, Block Chhuikhadan, Dist- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there.
2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period.
3.
Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025.
4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika