RAVINDER KUMAR @ FOJI v. THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)
BAIL APPLN./4427/2025 · 2026-02-27
Manoj Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3405 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3405 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 4427/2025
RAVINDER KUMAR @ FOJI
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP with Ins. Kaushlesh Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R %
27.02.2026
1. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present application at this stage. He, however, seeks liberty to file application at the subsequent stage, as and when need so arises.
2. The application stands disposed of as not pressed.
3. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.
4. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.
MANOJ JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sw/js
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:18:21