IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 614 Suman Lata State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned order whereby claim of the petitioner for been cancelled, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 7 of the written statement state that petitioner of ‘No Work No Pay’ is no replication 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises 02.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14685 Date of decision: 02.04.2025 Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned order whereby claim of the petitioner for arrears of pay w.e.f. 06.12.94 to 17.08.99 has been cancelled, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned State counsel refers to para 7 of the written statement that petitioner is not entitled to salary for period in question on the principle of ‘No Work No Pay’ as she did not work during the said period is no replication filed. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 14685-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned order arrears of pay w.e.f. 06.12.94 to 17.08.99 has been cancelled, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned State counsel refers to para 7 of the written statement is not entitled to salary for period in question on the principle during the said period, to which there Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the impugned order arrears of pay w.e.f. 06.12.94 to 17.08.99 has Learned State counsel refers to para 7 of the written statement to is not entitled to salary for period in question on the principle , to which there Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.03 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document