[2025:RJ-JP:9227] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18393/2024 Radheshyam Meena S/o Ramkhiladi Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Salempur Khurd, Bhusawar, Bharatpur-321407 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher And Technical Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Department Of College Education, Through Commissioner, Block-4, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur-302015 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, Ghooghra Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer-305001 (Raj.) 4. Assistant Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghra Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer-305001 (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18470/2024 Kamla Choudhary W/o Late Shri Narpat Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Samudayik Health Centre Baytu Chimanji, Gram Panchayat Baytu Chimanji, District Balotara, Rajasthan ( Roll No. 2630617) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of College Education, Shiksha Sankul Jln Marg, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission (Rpsc), Through Its Secretary, Ghughra Ghati, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. National Testing Agency (Nta), Through Its Joint Director (Exams), First Floor, Nsic-Mdbp Building, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi-110020. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:9227] (2 of 2) [CW-18393/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Purohit for Ms. Alankrita Sharma Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda Mr. Hemraj Rodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Singh, Dy. GC Mr. Mirza Faisal Baig Mr. Jaswant Persoya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/03/2025 1. Vide order dated 06.12.2024, the petitioners were provisionally permitted to appear in the interview pursuant to the impugned selection process. 2. On the erstwhile occasion, the respondents were directed to furnish before the Court the results of the petitioners in sealed covered envelopes. The same are furnished today and opened for perusal in presence of the counsel representing the petitioners. 3. Upon a perusal of the same by the Court and learned counsel for the parties, it is noted that petitioners are having less than eligibility/cut-off marks. 4. In light of the above, the petitions rendered infructuous and the same are accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 5. A copy of this order be placed in connected file. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /346-347