Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34032 (AP)

Smt.Perumalla Dhanalakshmi v. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation,

WP/1990/2015 · 2025-09-09

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010518972015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1990/2015 Between: 1. SMT.PERUMALLA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE.P HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT : 66 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE D.NO.10-50- 30/A, WATRAIR MAIN ROAD VISKHAPATNAM. 2. SMT.CHALAVADI JHANSI RANI, D/O.LATE P HANUMANTHA RAO W/O.CHALAVADI NAGA KANAKA DURGA PRASAD AGED : 44 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY REVENUE (JA) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 3. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt. 10.09.2025 SR