Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34029 (KAR)

M/S DIVYAJYOTHI VIDYA KENDRA v. HANUMANTHARAJU

WP/27346/2024 · 2025-04-24

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16931 WP No. 27346 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 27346 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S DIVYAJYOTHI VIDYA KENDRA A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT DIVYAJYOTHI VIDYA KENDRA, VISHWA KENDRA CHIKKANNA LAYOUT, NELMANGALA TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562 123. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI SRINIVAS. S S/O LATE SIDHABYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. H PAVITHRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.NEERAJ RAJIV SHIVAM., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. HANUMANTHARAJU S/O YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. RAMESH S/O YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. KAVERAMMA W/O OF YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16931 WP No. 27346 of 2024 4. CHAITRA W/O HANUMANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 5. CHANDRAMMA W/O RAMESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HANCHIPURA KASABA HOBLI, NELMANGALA TALUK-562123. …RESPONDENTS (BY AMBRISH B.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANTOSH S NAGARALE., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 27.09.2024 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 480 OF 2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU AT (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff submits that in view of the subsequent development, this petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16931 WP No. 27346 of 2024 2. The said fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the defendants. 3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 59