Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34026 (AP)

Sreeramsetty Raghavaiah v. Allam Bhagyalakshmi

SA/125/2010 · 2025-01-08

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010519002010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 125/2010 Between: Sreeramsetty Raghavaiah ...APPELLANT AND Allam Bhagyalakshmi ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P VIJAYA KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 24.11.2009 passed in A.S.No.283 of 2007 on the file of learned II Additional District Judge’s Court, Guntur, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 22.06.2007 passed in O.S.No.1322 of 2006 on the file of learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Guntur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:08.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.125 OF 2010 Date:08.01.2025 MS