IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 LPA-376-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.09.2025 SANTOKH SINGH ...Appellant Versus SUPERINTENDENT CANAL OFFICER, JANDIALA DIVISION UBDC, AMRITSAR AND OTHERS ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. B.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Dayal Pratap Randhawa, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 and 6. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order passed by the learned Single Judge is on the basis that a running watercourse has been demolished, which is incorrect and hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having not been pressed any further, with liberty to file a review application against order passed by the learned Single Judge. 2. Ordered accordingly. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 11, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.12 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment