124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAJESH STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR CRM-11243-2025 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of in filing the instant appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of condoned. MAIN CASE 1. Present 01.10.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, in a case bearing CIS No.CRA/8/2018 titled as ‘Kuldeep Kumar Vs. Parveen Dhanda’, vide which liberty was granted to the Collector, Hisar to rec amount from the surety IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH V/S HARYANA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Sanchit Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 2025 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of in filing the instant appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 110 days in filing the present appeal is hereby Present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 01.10.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, in a case bearing CIS No.CRA/8/2018 titled as ‘Kuldeep Kumar Vs. Parveen Dhanda’, vide which liberty was granted to the Collector, Hisar to rec amount from the surety-appellant. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-11243-2025 in/and CRA-S-917-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 24.04.2025 ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 110 days For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. days in filing the present appeal is hereby appeal has been preferred against the order dated 01.10.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, in a case bearing CIS No.CRA/8/2018 titled as ‘Kuldeep Kumar Vs. Parveen Dhanda’, vide which liberty was granted to the Collector, Hisar to recover the surety MANISHA 2025.04.28 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-11243-2025 CRA-S-917-2025 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from concerned submits that copy of the order passed by the Collector, Hisar for recovery surety amount has been supplied to the petitioner through concerned and he has received the copy. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition impugned order passed by Assistant Collector. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. April 24, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 2025 in/and 2025 (O & M) Learned State counsel, on instructions from concerned submits that copy of the order passed by the Collector, Hisar for recovery surety amount has been supplied to the petitioner through concerned and he has received the copy. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes nd seeks liberty to file a fresh petition impugned order passed by Assistant Collector. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Learned State counsel, on instructions from concerned Tehsildar submits that copy of the order passed by the Collector, Hisar for recovery of surety amount has been supplied to the petitioner through concerned Patwari wishes to withdraw the present nd seeks liberty to file a fresh petition after laying challenge to the Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.28 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment