[2025:RJ-JP:35974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 176/2024 Prem Chand Jat S/o Shri Kailash Chand, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Kanwada, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Rohitash S/o Ramkaran, R/o Village Dusaraheda, Police Station Baroda, Mev, District Alwar. 3. Krishan Kumar S/o Vajeer Singh, R/o Kansala, Police Sta- tion I.m.t. Rohatak (Haryana). 4. Vikas Kumar Gupta S/o Ramavtar, R/o R.z. 8/329, Madanpuri, Gali No. 10, New Delhi. 5. Rajendra S/o Raghuveer, R/o Kafanwada, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar. 6. Narendra S/o Chotelal Pradeep, R/o Kaanwada, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/08/2025 Heard. By way of this application under Section 483(3) of BNSS, the petitioner-complainant has approached this Court seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to the respondent Nos.2 to 6 by order dated 26.09.2023 passed by this court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12084/2023. Vide order dated 26.09.2023, bail application of the accused respondents was accepted bail by this Court. While accepting the said bail application, counsel representing the complainant did not [2025:RJ-JP:35974] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-176/2024] oppose the same and thus, looking to the fact that parties have entered into compromise and complainant side has not opposed the bail application, the accused respondents were ordered to be released on bail. Thereafter, on 28.11.2024 that is almost after one year and two months, this bail cancellation application has been filed by the complainant side referring an alleged hit and run accident happened on 17.10.2024 wherein son of the complainant petitioner and Aslam sustained injuries on their heads, hands and legs in an accident by a car allegedly driven by the accused respondents. Nothing concrete has been placed on record by the complainant petitioner which persuades this Court that the accused respondents have misused the liberty of bail. General and omnibus allegations of misuse of liberty of bail for creating pressure to enter into compromise are there in this bail cancellation application. The complaint filed by the complainant petitioner in connection with the alleged hit and run incident is under investigation and there is no final conclusion. In this view of the matter, I do not find any substance in this bail cancellation application. Thus, the instant bail cancellation application is dismissed. However, the accused respondents are directed not to threaten the petitioner/complainant and his family members in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /48