Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34010 (ALL)

RAJEEV BHARGAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3870/2025 · 2025-04-28

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67000 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3870 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Bhargava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Chaubey,Satyendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying for following reliefs:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the amended G.O. No. Sankhya-3-1508/Das-2008-308-97 dated 8.12.2008 issued by the Finance (General) Section-3 of State of U.P. and restored the period as 15 years in U.P. Civil Pension (Communication) Rules 1941. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to return the reduced amount of the petitioner." It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a retired employee, who has retired in the year 2010 and the recovery is being made from the pension of the petitioner in pursuance to the Government Order dated 8.12.2008. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the present dispute is already decided by this Court by judgment and order dated 6.3.2025 passed in Writ-A No.19031 of 2024, Radheshyam Shukla and others Vs. State of U.P. and others and connected writ petitions whereby the contentions were rejected and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid judgment. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 6.3.2025. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Bhaskar Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad