Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34006 (ALL)

PRIYANSHU v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/10239/2025 · 2025-04-16

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56396 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10239 of 2025 Applicant :- Priyanshu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Prakash Dubey,Prashant Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar and Narendra Kumar learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.K.Rai learned AGA-Ist, for the State- respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Priyansu, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 41 of 2025, under Sections-109, 352, 351 (2), (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act and Section 3/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station- Parikshitgarh, District-Meerut. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 27.02.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that First Information Report has been lodged against four known and some unknown persons, including the applicant. Only general allegations have been levelled against all the accused persons. Recovery of one country made pistol, shown from the possession of the applicant is planted one. He has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Priyanshu, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Deepak/ Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad