CWP No.6785 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 151-2 SUKHDEV Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. The short prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is for issuance of direction to the learned Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the instance of petitioner having invoked Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956. [2]. Learned State counsel on instructions from respondent No. that the petition(s) months from today. [3]. In view of aforesaid statement made on behalf of respondent No. present writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case the petition(s) preferred under Section Section 3(G)(5) of the Na 1956 is not decided on or before 31.10.2025, petitioner would cost(s) of Rs.50,000/ [4]. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. August 13, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2023 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. Date of Decision: ARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) The short prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is for issuance of direction to the learned Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the instance of petitioner having invoked Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway Learned State counsel on instructions from respondent No. (s) filed at the instance of petitioner shall be dispo months from today. In view of aforesaid statement made on behalf of respondent No. present writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case the petition(s) preferred under Section Section 3(G)(5) of the Na 1956 is not decided on or before 31.10.2025, petitioner would cost(s) of Rs.50,000/- per month for the delay period towards litigation expenses. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6785 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.08.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioner. Ms. Komal Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana. The short prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is for issuance of direction to the learned Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the petition filed at the instance of petitioner having invoked Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway Learned State counsel on instructions from respondent No.2 submits filed at the instance of petitioner shall be disposed of within two In view of aforesaid statement made on behalf of respondent No.2, the present writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case the petition(s) preferred under Section Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956 is not decided on or before 31.10.2025, petitioner would be entitled for per month for the delay period towards litigation expenses. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 The short prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is for issuance of petition filed at the instance of petitioner having invoked Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway submits sed of within two , the present writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case the tional Highway Act, entitled for per month for the delay period towards litigation expenses. MOHMED ATIK 2025.08.13 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment