1 / 2 2025:CGHC:34488 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3793 of 2025 Tankeshwar Kumar Patel S/o Siya Ram Patel Aged About 50 Years R/o Village - Temar, Tehsil - Sakti, District - Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Health Mantralaya, Mahanadi, Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Sakti, District Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sakti, District - Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Tehsildar, Sakti, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 21/07/2025 1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner is challenging the action of the respondent authorities whereby a District Hospital which ought to have been constructed in the area of Village Temar, Tehsil Sakti, District Sakti, however, the same has been decided to be constructed at Village Sakreli, Tehsil Baradwar, District Sakti, due to which the residents of the village Temar and nearby areas would face ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.07.22 11:22:22 +0530 2 / 2 difficulties to secure timely medical emergency. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this juncture would confine his prayer to direct the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P/7 filed by the petitioner within a time frame. 3. Learned State counsel would submit that they have no objection in deciding the application of the petitioner. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that Respondent authorities shall decide the representation (Annexure P/7) filed by the petitioner expeditiously as soon as possible. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu