Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33999 (AP)

YADARAJU SATYANARAYANA RAJU v. DR. BODAPATI PRABHAKARA RAO

CRP/1928/2022 · 2025-07-30

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010517082022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1928/2022 Between: 1. YADARAJU SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O. NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED 57 YEARS, RETTIRED EMPLOYEE, D.NO.66-2-7/4, NARASANNA NAGAR, KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR BODAPATI PRABHAKARA RAO, S o Late Venkateswarlu, Aged 63 years, R/o. Patttabhipuram, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toCivil Revision Petition against the order in E.P.No.32 of 2019 in O.S.No.410 of 2016 dated 23-08- 2022 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, for the following among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to dispense with filing Xerox Copy of Plaint in OS. 410 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil, Judge Kakinada and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to dispense with filing Xerox Copy of Plaint in OS. 410 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil, Judge Kakinada and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1928 of 2022 ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt: 31.07.2025 sj 140 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.1928 of 2022 Date 31.07.2025 sj