Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3399 (RAJ)

JAID KYUM KHAN S/O KYUM MOHAMMAD KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/637/2025 · 2025-06-13

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23178] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 637/2025 Jaid Kyum Khan S/o Kyum Mohammad Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Flat No. 1, Ali Manzil Apartment Near Secade Heart School, Ashoka Marg, Police Station Mumbai Naka, District Nasik Maharshtra. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar, District Alwar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma with Mr. Amir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, G.A.-cum-AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner in respect of F.I.R. No.23/2024 registered at Police Station Cyber (Alwar) District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and 66-C & 66-D of I.T. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the offences alleged against him in the FIR are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant matter, whereas, he has not committed the offences alleged against him. There are no criminal antecedents against him. [2025:RJ-JP:23178] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-637/2025] 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner further submits that in the instant matter charge-sheet has been filed. He is no longer required for custodial interrogation. Trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to enlarge on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 6. In view of above, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant the bail application. 7. Accordingly, the Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Jaid Kyum Khan S/o Kyum Mohammad Khan shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No.23/2024 registered at Police Station Cyber (Alwar) District Alwar on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv) He shall regularly mark his attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:23178] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-637/2025] (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. 8. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DAKSH/22