PINKI D/O RADHEYSHYAM W/O BABLU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15212/2024 · 2025-01-07
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33989 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33989 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:859] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 15212/2024 Pinki D/o Radheyshyam W/o Bablu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhimsagar, Police Station Sarola, At Present Haripura Khurd, Police Station Mandawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Mahila Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order 07/01/2025
1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 211/2024 registered at Police Station Suket, District Kota Rural for offence u/S 317 IPC.
2. The first bail application bearing No. 8640/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 24.09.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application after examination of the material prosecution witness namely Bablu.
3. Heard.
4. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the challan papers as well as the statement of the prosecution witness examined so far.
5. In view of the fact that in the statement of Bablu recorded u/S 161 CrPC, he has stated that his accused wife did not intimate
[2025:RJ-JP:859] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15212/2024] him about the miscarriage of fetus. The husband of the accused petitioner has been examined as PW-4 and he has not supported the prosecution story and has been declared hostile.
6. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused petitioner and the other material available on record in the form of charge-sheet and the statement of the prosecution witness and also the fact that the accused petitioner is a woman and is in custody since 26.06.2024, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /32