Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33988 (KAR)

SRI GOVINDAPPA v. MR. SHREYAS

CCC/1064/2024 · 2025-06-03

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18698-DB CCC No. 1064 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1064 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI GOVINDAPPA, S/O. LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT SINGAHALLI, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 149. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI AMITH XAVIER C, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. SHREYAS, THE THASILDHAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGLAURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560 064. 2. Mr. PRAMOD L. PATIL, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, NORTH TALUK BENGALURU, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 009. Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18698-DB CCC No. 1064 of 2024 3. MR. JAGADISH, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560 009. … ACCUSED 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC INFORMATION DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA FOR PROFORMA R4; ACCUSED NO.1, 2 AND 3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING VIOLATED THE ORDER DATED 16.08.2021 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.14840/2021 (KLR-RES). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18698-DB CCC No. 1064 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the order of which non-compliance is alleged has been complied with, he wishes to withdraw the contempt petition. 2. Recording the above submission, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12