Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33988 (BOM)

SUDAM UTTAMRAO KINGRE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/1821/2025 · 2025-03-18

Shri S G Mehare, Shri Sandipkumar C More

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 907 CA 1821-25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1821 OF 2025 IN WP/3444/2024 SUDAM UTTAMRAO KINGRE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sujit R. Varma h/f Mr. Chapalgaonkar Shailesh S., Advocate for Applicant Mr. D. R. Korade, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Y. V. Kakade, Advocate for Respondent No.2 & 3 in WP …. CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 18/03/2025. P. C. : 1. Leave granted to correct the name of the applicant. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3. By way of this civil application, the petitioner wanted to add documents mentioned in the application alongwith relevant documents. 3. Perused the application. We find no prejudice to other side if the civil application is allowed. Hence, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) (S. G. MEHARE, J.) VS Maind/- 2025:BHC-AUG:7832-DB