LALIT KUMAR PARASHAR S/O SHRI GANPAT PARASHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15079/2024 · 2025-02-20
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33985 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33985 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:7787] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15079/2024 Lalit Kumar Parashar S/o Shri Ganpat Parashar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Silore, P.s. Sadar, District Bundi, At Present Fit On Streat (Fos), State Bank Of India, Branch Bada Nayagaon, District Bundi (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 20/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.248/2024 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District for the offence punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988. Later on, Police has filed charge-sheet in this matter.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that false recovery of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousands Rupees) has been shown from the petitioner. He contends that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time. He argues that the petitioner
[2025:RJ-JP:7787] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15079/2024] is in custody since 05.11.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that charge- sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Lalit Kumar Parashar S/o Shri Ganpat Parashar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J GAUTAM JAIN /93