LALARAM S/O PRABHATI LAL MALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8155/2024 · 2025-01-09
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33978 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33978 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1343] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8155/2024
1. Lalaram S/o Prabhati Lal Mali, R/o Sanjay Colony, Kasba Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj).
2. Heeralal S/o Prabhati Lal Mali, R/o Sanjay Colony, Kasba Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj).
3. Kailash S/o Ramniwas Doli, R/o Ward No. 20, Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj).
4. Shakar Lal S/o Bhura Ram Meena, R/o Village Badh Balmukundpura Urf Basada, Tehsil Kotkhawada, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Hansraj Gurjar S/o Babu Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Manpur Dungari, Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Arpit Dotasra JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 09/01/2025
1. The parties have put in appearance in person and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel.
2. The present misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 502/2023 registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Section(s) 420, 406 & 120B IPC.
3. It is stated at Bar that compromise has arrived at between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that the
[2025:RJ-JP:1343] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-8155/2024] complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the present matter.
4. This Court vide order dated 05.12.2024 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of compromise between them. Pursuant to the aforesaid direction issued by this Court the parties appeared before the Investigating Officer who has verified the factum of compromise between them and has furnished a report in this regard dated 15.12.2024. Copy of the verification report issued by the SHO Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) is ordered to be taken on record.
5.
Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688.
6.
Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the dispute between the parties is purely of civil nature which has been amicably settled and the complainant does not want to pursue the matter against the petitioner.
7. In view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties as well as the report dated 15.12.2024, furnished by the SHO Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) and in the light of judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke the inherent powers conferred under Section 528 B.N.S.S.
8. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.502/2023 as well as the proceedings arising out of the FIR
[2025:RJ-JP:1343] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-8155/2024] No.502/2023 against the petitioners with Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) stands quashed.
9. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Garima/113